雅思作文社会类

时间：2017-05-09 来源：东星资源网本文已影响人手机版

篇一：雅思社会类话题类作文分析

智课网IELTS备考资料

雅思社会类话题类作文分析

摘要：应考生们的要求，今天小编为大家主要介绍一下雅思社会类话题类作文分析相关内容，大家在练习的时候要根据自己的实际情况来确定练习方法，这样才能在雅思考试上最大程度的发挥自己的实力，拿到雅思高分。

小马过河雅思小编今天为考生们带来一篇双面论述性的雅思范文，所谓，双面论述就是对一个社会现象的两个相反的不同方面分别叙述从而得出笔者的观点，今天带来的话题是有关科技技术进步的雅思写作范文，考生们可以参考一下写作思路，改善自身写作方式，希望能给考生们一些帮助。

题目: Some people think that technology improves the quality of life. whereas others feel that creates new problems that threaten the quality of life.Discuss both these views and suggest your opinion?

范文：

Science and technology have great influence in human life since their inception. A lot of technological advancements have been taking place day by day, and which clearly reflect on peoples life styles both positively and negatively.This essay focuses on some pros and cons of technological advancements, and asserts the need of reducing the precarious outcome of it for the rise of a risk free society in future.

Technology is considered to be the one,is developed to reduce the effort of people.Which provides countless visible advantages for human beings. It is conspicuous that from paper clips to ultra-modern space crafts work on the principles of science and technology. Moreover,people are much relay on the benefits of this and a life with out

computers, vehicles and other tech-applications is unable to imagine.Thus it is obvious that, now the human life runs with the beats of these advancements.

However,at the same pace technology brings some threats to people.For instance,the inventions of weapons

especially nuclear war gadgets are extremely dangerous for the existence of the entire life forms on earth. In addition to that, an increased use of motor vehicles causes the contamination of our ecosystem, and thereby which directs certain problems such as global warming and unsteady climates.So the in appropriate application of these

advancements will lead us to tremendous problems.

To my mind, the appropriate use of technology by taking the positive effects and by ignoring the cons, can bring about great changes in our life styles. By promoting global peace by anti war campaigns can counter the use of weapons.Also, making an awareness in individuals about the hazardous outcome of increased fuel emission from automobiles can be instrumental in avoiding threats associated with global warming.

In a conclusion, the advantages and disadvantages of science and technology is purely depend up on the way in which which is applied. If it uses for goodness then it gives good results.Lets hope for a world without enduring the dangerous outcome of these inventions in near future.

以上就是小马科技为考生们带来的雅思社会类话题类作文分析关于解析，看了这些解析,大家应该了解了雅思考试出题方式上的特点,也就可以根据这些特点来准备材料,做到有备无患，只有知己知彼，才能百战不殆，更多雅思考试资料请关注小马科技官方网站。

编辑推荐：

雅思写作常用插入语

雅思写作经典例句集锦

雅思写作环境类素材

相关字搜索：雅思写作材料

篇二：雅思写作社会道德类范文

智课网IELTS备考资料

雅思写作社会道德类范文

摘要：我们今天为大家带来的是雅思写作社会道德类范文相关内容，希望大家能够对所学的知识进行融会贯通，在备考雅思考试的时候，针对自己的特点进行适当的参考和借鉴，才有利于提高自己的成绩。

北京小马过河雅思为大家带来雅思写作社会道德类范文，主要是对近期流行的话题进行分析，我们搜集整理了很多雅思话题，今天介绍的是社会公德。希望对正在准备雅思考试的烤鸭们有所帮助。希望对大家2015年雅思写作考试有所帮助!

Social morality isthe set of social-moral rules that require or prohibit action, and so grounds moral imperatives that we direct to each other to engage in, or refrain from, certain lines of conduct.

Notice that Gaus emphasizes that he is not talking about the whole domain of the normative. Instead, his focus is on a particular kind of normativity, one that involvessocially practiced demands and imperatives.

An essential feature of social morality is that it serves a social function; it “has its roots in this requirement of social life.” The rules of social morality “structure social interaction.” Gaus emphasizes that social morality must have the practical function of making us better off: “certainly one of the things morality must do is allow us to live together in cooperative, mutually beneficial, social relations.”

The “Baier-Strawson” view of social morality is that social morality is a set of rules that allow us to live well together and that require our obedience. Social morality is contrasted with personal values or “individual ideals.” Social morality is comprised of rules that both “provide the conditions for the successful pursuit of these ideals” but also

“simultaneously constrain our choices about how to pursue them.”

Social morality provides “the basis for issuing demands on others that they must perform certain actions.” Gaus contrasts this view of modern social morality with an ancient, Aristotelian teleological account of morality that understands moral rules in terms of the ends they promote.

For Gaus, social-moral rules have a prescriptive function. They have their home in our social practices. Gaus is clear to emphasize that he rejects the simple contrast between descriptivist and prescriptivist accounts of the semantics of moral statements. Instead, following R.M. Hare, he claims that many moral statements have both elements. This key feature of social morality makes social morality a social phenomenon. In other words, partof the essence of social-moral rules is that they are used to control others. We use moral rules to tell each other what to do. Morality, furthermore, makes “my action your business” because it assigns standing to you to make demands of me.

A critic might reply that the authority of morality is distinct from the authority of those who interpret it. But Gaus

follows Hobbes and Kant in pointing out the fact that morality does not “fax its demands from above” but is instead often unclear. People disagree about what absolute or True morality consists in. As will become clear, social morality is a method of resolving disputes about what the True morality is. However, social morality’s claims must have authority that all can recognize despite their disagreements about what Morality-with-a-capital-M is. If social morality cannot ground authority despite disagreement about ultimate normativity then our social practices cannot be authoritative

despite disagreement. The authority of social morality in a diverse world becomes impossible. But surely, Gaus suggests, this cannot be true.

The sixth feature of social morality is that it is constituted by claims of moral authority, but moral authority

understood as “a claim to deference in judgment.” In its most fundamental mode, moral authority is the authority to demand that others follow your interpretation of Morality-with-a-capital-M. Moral authority “qua moral power” is important but this form authority is downstream from moral authority as a claim to deference in judgment.

以上就是北京小马过河雅思这次为备考雅思写作的同学们准备的2015雅思写作话题题库之社会公德的雅思写作答案。希望大家对雅思写作话题有所熟悉并了解考官的提问思路。今后还会有更多2015最新最全雅思写作话题，尽情期待小马过河雅思官网。

编辑推荐：

雅思写作常用插入语

雅思写作经典例句集锦

雅思写作环境类素材

雅思作文社会类

文章分类

最新发表