[腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉在阴式全子宫切除术中的临床应用]腰麻和硬膜外麻醉的区别

时间:2019-01-20 来源:东星资源网 本文已影响 手机版

  [摘要] 目的 探讨腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉(CSEA)在阴式全子宫切除术中的应用效果及其安全性。方法 选择80例择期行阴式全子宫切除术患者,随机分成观察组(CSEA)和对照组(EA),每组各40例;麻醉药物0.5%布比卡因1.5-2ml、0.5%耐乐品(20.5±6.8)ml。记录所有患者麻醉效果、肌松效果和不良反应等情况;监测血压、心率、ECG、氧饱和度变化情况。结果 观察组麻醉效果明显优于对照组(P<0.01);牵拉宫颈时,对照组HR明显减慢,与观察组比较有统计学意义(P<0.05);麻醉后两组血压均有所下降,与观察组相比,对照组下降幅度更加明显(P<0.05)。结论 腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉起效快,不良反应低,是临床上阴式全子宫切除术安全有效的方法。
  [关键词] 腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉; 硬膜外麻醉; 阴式全子宫切除术
  [中图分类号] R614 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1005-0515(2012)-02-017-01
  
  Comparison of Clinical using Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Transvaginal Hysterectomy
  Li Yaohui
  (Anaesthesia of FanYu Shi-qiao hospital,Guangzhou Guangdong Guangzhou 511400 China)
  [Abstract] Objective To discuss the effect and safety of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in transvaginal hysterectomy.Methods 80 cases of patients with transvaginal hysterectomy were choosen and randomly divided into observation group(CSEA) and control group(EA),each group of 40 cases.Anesthetic drugs is 0.5% bupivacaine 1.5-2ml+0.5% ropivacaine(20.5±6.8)ml.Anaesthetic effect、muscle relaxation effect and adverse reaction were recorded.All of the patients were monitoring the BP、HR、ECG、SPO2.Results The observation group was better than control anaesthetic effect (P<0.01);Pull the cervix,the control group HR obvious to slow, and the observation group has more statistically significant (P

标签:子宫 麻醉 临床应用 切除术