篇一：优秀SCI论文结构范例
优秀SCI论文结构范例
1、Abstract——对自己工作及其贡献的总结：a）阐述问题；b）说明自己的解决方案和结果。
2、Introduction——背景，以及文章的大纲：
a）题X是重要的；
b）前人的工作A、B曾经研究过这个问题；
c）A、B有一些缺陷；d）我们提出了方法D；
e）D的基本特征，和A、B进行比较；
f）实验证明D比A、B优越；
g）文章的基本结构，大纲。
3、PreviousWork——说明自己与前人的不同：
a）将历史上前人的工作分成类别；
b）对每项重要的历史工作进行简短的回顾(一到几句)，注意要回顾正确，抓住要点，避免歧义；
c）和自己提出的工作进行比较；
d）不要忽略前人的重要工作，要公正评价前人的工作，不要过于苛刻；
e）强调自己的工作和前人工作的不同，最好举出各自适用例子。
4、OurWork——描述自己的工作，可分成多个部分：(原文来自：wWW.DxF5.com 东 星资源网:sci论文致谢模板)
a）从读者角度阐明定义和表示法；
b）提供算法的伪码，图解和相应解释；
c）用设问的方式回答读者可能提出的潜在问题；
d）复杂的冗长的证明和细节可以放在附录中，这里关键是把问题阐述清楚；
e）特例和例外应该在脚注中给予说明。
5、Experiments——验证提出的方法和思路：
a）合理地设计实验（简洁的实验和详尽的实验步骤）
b）必要的比较，突出科学性；
c）讨论，说明结果的意义；
d）给出结论。
6、Conclusion——总结、前景及结文：
a）快速简短的总结；
b）未来工作的展望；
c）结束全文。
7、References——对相关重要背景文献全面引用：
a）选择引文（众所周知的结论不必引用，其他人的工作要引用）； b）与前文保持一致。
8、Others——致谢、附录、脚注。
篇二：关于英文感谢信格式文章
关于英文感谢信格式文章
英文感谢信格式
感谢信是重要的礼仪文书，是向帮助、关心和支持过自己的集体（党政机关、企事业单位、社会团体等）或个人表示感谢的专业书信，有感谢和表扬双重意思。一方受惠于另一方，应及时地表达谢忱，使对方在付出劳动和贡献后得到心理上和精神上的收益，它是一种不可少的公关手段。
【写作格式】
感谢信的写作格式主要分以下三个部分。
首段：表明写作意图，让对方感受到你的谢意是发自内心的。
主体段落：写明感谢的原因，要展开说明，可以说具体的理由也可以说接受帮助的具体事例。比如说你在一家旅馆住了一段时间，在那里度过了一段美好的时光，你就可以写信表示感谢。【关于英文感谢信格式文章】关于英文感谢信格式文章。你可以从旅馆的服务、客房环境、饮食卫生等方面来说明感谢的理由。这样展开就使文章显得充实丰满，也符合正常交际的习惯。
结尾段：再次表达诚挚的谢意并问候对方。
【英文感谢信格式范文】
Dear Prof. Herthwell,
亲爱的Herthwell教授：
Many thanks for your kind hospitality and the honor you showed me during our delegation’s recent visit to your university. It was nice of you to introduce me to so many famous professors and celebrated scholars at your university. We had a safe and sound trip home. Now we have resumed our work.
非常感谢你的盛情款待，以及在你在我们的代表团最近访问你的大学时对我们的尊敬。谢谢你把我介绍给那么多您大学里的知名教授和著名的学者。我们已经平安愉悦得回到家了。【关于英文感谢信格式文章】ss my thanks for...我写这封信是为了表达我对??的谢意
I would like to convey in this letter my heartfelt thanks to you for... 在信中我要为……表达我真挚的谢意
Many thanks for all the good things you have done in helping us to...非常感谢您为帮助我们 ｘｘｘ所做的一切。
I would like to convey in this letter my heartfelt thanks to you for...
I feel deeply indebted to you and I really don't know how to thank you enough for your help.
On behalf of my whole family, I would like to extend my sincere gratitude for...我谨代表我全家对ｘｘｘ表示真诚的感激之情。
My true gratitude is beyond any words description.任何语言都不能表达我的真挚谢意。
【感谢信结尾段常用句式】
I would like to take this opportunity to express my great appreciation for your timely help and assistance.我谨借此机会感谢您给予我们的及时帮助和支持。【关于英文感谢信格式文章】感谢信ganxiexin.htm。
Nothing will be able to erase our wonderful memories, we will nurture them forever.没什么能抹掉我们美好的记忆，我们会永远铭刻在心。
Thanks again for your kind help.对你的帮助再次表示感谢。
Please accept my thanks, now and always.请永远记住我的谢意。
Your help is very much appreciated by each one of us.我们每个人都非常感谢你
I must thank you again for your generous help.
I am most grateful for your selfless donation.
My true gratitude is beyond the word's description.
I feel most obliged to thank you once more.
篇三：一些英文审稿意见及回复的模板
一些英文审稿意见的模板
最近在审一篇英文稿，第一次做这个工作，还有点不知如何表达。幸亏遇上我的处女审稿，我想不会枪毙它的，给他一个major revision后接收吧。呵呵
网上找来一些零碎的资料参考参考。
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical methods used in the study.
Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did these various experiments should be provided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：
The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：
A hypothesis needs to be presented。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：
What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?
7、对研究问题的定义：
Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear, write one section to define the problem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:
The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.
9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification:
There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.
10、严谨度问题：
MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.
11、格式（重视程度）：
In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with "Instructions for Authors" which shows examples.
Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, please consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and Forms" button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.
12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：
有关语言的审稿人意见：
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper
translation/reviewing service before submission; only then can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not complete sentences.
As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are problems with sentence structure, verb tense, and clause construction. The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We strongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-versed in English or whose native language is English.
Please have someone competent in the English language and the subject matter of your paper go over the paper and correct it ?
the quality of English needs improving.
作为审稿人，本不应该把编辑部的这些信息公开（冒风险啊），
但我觉得有些意见值得广大投稿人注意，
就贴出来吧，当然，有关审稿人的名字，Email，文章题名信息等就都删除了， 以免造成不必要的麻烦！
希望朋友们多评价，其他有经验的审稿人能常来指点大家！
国人一篇文章投Mater.类知名国际杂志，
被塞尔维亚一审稿人打25分！
个人认为文章还是有一些创新的，
所以作为审稿人我就给了66分，（这个分正常应该足以发表），提了一些修改意见，望作者修改后发表！
登录到编辑部网页一看，一个文章竟然有六个审稿人，
详细看了下打的分数，60分大修，60分小修，66分（我），25分拒，（好家伙，竟然打25分，有魄力），拒但没有打分（另一国人审），最后一个没有回来！
两个拒的是需要我们反思和学习的！
（括号斜体内容为我注解）
Reviewer 4
Reviewer Recommendation Term: Reject
Overall Reviewer Manuscript Rating: 25
Comments to Editor: Reviewers are required to enter their name, affiliation and e-mail address below. Please note this is for administrative purposes and will not be seen by the author.
Title (Prof./Dr./Mr./Mrs.): Prof.
Name: XXX
Affiliation: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx
Manuscript entitled "Synthesis XXX。。。。。。。。。。。" it has been synthesized with a number of different methods and in a variety of forms. This manuscript does not bring any new knowledge or data on materials property and therefore only contribution may be in novel preparation method, still this point is not elaborated properly (see Remark 1). Presentation and writing is rather poor; there are several statements not supported with data (for some see Remarks 2) and even some flaws (see Remark 3). For these reasons I suggest to reject paper in the present form.
1. The paper describes a new method for preparation of XXXX, but:
- the new method has to be compared with other methods for preparation of XXXXpowders (INTRODUCTION - literature data, RESULTS AND DISCUSSION - discussion),（通常的写作格式，审稿人实际上很在意的）
- it has to be described why this method is better or different from other methods, (INTRODUCTION - literature data, RESULTS AND DISCUSSION - discussion),
- it has to be added in the manuscript what kind of XXXXXX by other methods compared to this novel one (INTRODUCTION - literature data, RESULTS AND DISCUSSION - discussion),
- it has to be outlined what is the benefit of this method (ABSTRACT, RESULTS AND DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS).
（很多人不会写这个地方，大家多学习啊）
2. When discussing XRD data XXXauthors
- state that XXXXX
- state that XXXX
- This usually happens with increasing sintering time, but are there any data to present, density, particle size?
（很多人用XRD，结果图放上去就什么都不管了，这是不应该的）
3. When discussing luminescence measurements authors write "XXXXXIf there is second harmonic in excitation beam it will stay there no matter what type of material one investigates!!!
（研究了什么？？？）
4.英语写作要提高
（这条很多人的软肋，大家努力啊）
Reviewer 5
Reviewer Recommendation Term: Reject
Overall Reviewer Manuscript Rating: N/A
Comments to Editor:
Title (Prof./Dr./Mr./Mrs.)rof.
Name:（国人）
Affiliation: XXXXXXXXxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXxxxx
Dear editor:
Thank you for inviting me to evaluate the article titled "XXXX“. In this paper, the authors investigated the influences of sintering condition on the crystal structure and XXXXXX， However, it is difficult for us to understand the manuscript because of poor English being used.
The text is not well arranged and the logic is not clear. Except English writing, there are many mistakes in the manuscript and the experimental results don't show good and new results. So I recommend to you that this manuscript can not be accepted. The following are the questions and some mistakes in this manuscript:
（看看总体评价，不达标，很多人被这样郁闷了，当然审稿人也有他的道理）
1. TheXXXXXXX. However, this kind material had been investigated since 1997 as mentioned in the author's manuscript, and similar works had been published in similar journals. What are the novel findings in the present work? The synthesis method and luminescence properties reported in this manuscript didn't supply enough evidence to support the prime novelty statement.
（这位作者好猛，竟然翻出自己1997年的中文文章翻译了一边就敢投国际知名杂志，而且没有新的创新！
朋友们也看到了，一稿多发，中文，英文双版发表在网络时代太难了，运气不好
审稿人也是国人，敢情曾经看过你的文章，所以必死无疑，这位作者老兄就命运差了，刚好被审稿人看见，所以毫无疑问被拒，（呵呵，我97年刚上初一没见到这个文章，哈哈））
2. In page 5, the author mentioned that: "XXXX Based on our knowledge, "sintering" describes the process when the powders become ceramics. So, I think the word "synthesis" should be better instead of "sintering" here. Second, the XRD patterns didn't show obvious difference between three "sintering" temperatures of 700, 800 and 900 ?C.
（作者老兄做工作太不仔细了，虫子们可别犯啊）
3. Also in the page X, the author mentioned that: XXX。。。。。。。。。。 However, the author didn't supply the morphologies of particles at different synthesizing temperatures. What are the experimental results or the references which support the author's conclusion that the XXXX properties would be influenced by the particle size?
（作者仍在瞎说，这个问题我也指出了，不光我还是看着国人的份上让修改，添加很多东西，说实话，文章看的很累很累）
4. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX However, to my knowledge, after the milling, the particles size will be decreased exactly, but how and what to destroy the host structure?
（虫子们自己注意）
5. XXX on the vertical axis of the XRD patterns was meaningless, because author add several patterns in one figure. It is obvious that these spectra are not measured by ordinary methods. （都是老问题，不说了）
好东西
原文地址：对英文审稿意见的回复作者：海天奥博
一篇稿子从酝酿到成型历经艰辛，投出去之后又是漫长的等待，好容易收到编辑的回信，得到的往往又是审稿人不留情面的一顿狂批。这时候，如何有策略有技巧的回复审稿人就显得尤为重要。好的回复是文章被接收的重要砝码，而不恰当的回复轻则导致再次修改从而拖延发稿时间，重则导致文章被拒，前功尽弃。下面把我平时总结的一些答复审稿人的策略和写回复信的格式和技巧跟大家交流一下。